Thursday, September 20, 2007

Puerto Rico community, public demand justice after police execution of worker


By Tom Soto
San Juan, Puerto Rico

Published Aug 23, 2007 8:08 AM

A mother and father are destroyed due to the horrible death of their son. A 10
year old cries uncontrollably on his mother’s lap. A wife mourns the loss
of her husband, and two daughters will never see their father again. A brother
is engulfed with pain and anger. An oppressed community demands justice.




Video shows police shooting
Miguel Cáceres Cruz.


At 6 p.m. on Aug. 11, 43-year-old Miguel Cáceres Cruz of the southeastern
city of Humacao, in Puerto Rico, had parked his scooter along with several
other motorcyclists in front of the establishment El Playerito in the barrio of
Punta Santiago.


Cáceres and his friends were going to provide a motorcycle escort to a 15
year old who was celebrating her birthday. This kind of event is commonplace in
Puerto Rico.


Soon thereafter police from the “elite” Division of Tactical
Operations (DOT) were on the scene, supposedly complaining about vehicular
traffic. Moments later Cáceres was in a pool of blood, shot four times,
once directly in the back of the head.


In Puerto Rico, more often than not, an incident such as this would be
immediately covered up, “whitewashed” as the saying goes. Police
would act to protect one another, plant a weapon within reach of the victim and
claim self-defense. But in this case, a bystander videotaped the atrocity and
delivered the footage to Univision’s channel 11.




Evelyn Ramírez, daughters Michelle and
Jenny, and father Miguel stand before
casket of Miguel Cáceres Cruz.

The next day and during the entire week TV stations and Puerto Rico’s
newspapers El Nuevo Día, Primera Hora and El Vocero showed pictures of the
slaying, while their Internet editions aired the video.


The video can be seen on the Internet at www.breitbart.tv/?p=4344 and is
available at other Internet sites. It shows Cáceres being grabbed and
thrown to the ground. He is attacked by the cops and kicked by police officer
Javier Pagán, while community residents plead with the three police agents
to stop. Bystanders are heard shouting: “Stop!” “What are you
doing, abusers?” “Don’t do that!”


To the shock of anyone who views the video, Pagán discharges his gun, at
first shooting himself in the leg. Then, while Cáceres is on the ground
and unarmed, the cop shoots him several times.


Finally, while Miguel Cáceres’ body is lying motionless and
bleeding, face down on the ground, Pagán stands over Miguel’s body
and shoots him again, execution style in the back of the head.

Police attempt coverup


Before the video was exhibited in the media, chief of police for the Humacao
region Edwin Rivera Merced defended the actions of the police as
“self-defense.” In fact, in the initial police report regarding the
police killing, Pagán was not even identified as the shooter.


But as the video began to be seen by the public, radio talk shows began
analyzing the footage and callers took to the airways expressing their disgust,
a mood of outrage developed throughout this entire island nation, which has
been a colony of the U.S. since 1898.


The public mood generated by the video was so strong that the president of
Puerto Rico’s Supreme Court, Federico Hernández Denton, telephoned
Evelyn Ramírez, the widow of Cáceres.


This gesture from the titular head of the judicial system is unheard of. It was
obvious that the atrocity has put the judicial system and police on the extreme
defensive. Even Superintendent of Police Pedro Toledo, upon being confronted by
reporters, was forced to admit that “the video shows Miguel Cáceres
being executed.”


Family & community mourn loss


Miguel Cáceres Maldonado, father of the victim, told the press:
“This is the worst abuse I have seen in my life. No one should be shot
while lying on the ground, especially when they are lying face down.”


Mayra Vásquez, who was present at the scene said: “Everyone was
yelling: ‘Don’t do it!’ ‘Don’t do it!’ ...
but the policeman continued beating him. ... He killed him without
compassion.”


Evelyn Ramírez, wife of Miguel Cáceres, said: “This incident
has wiped out our dreams. ... We had many. ... We were a loving, beautiful and
united family. ... One sees these incidents in the news, involving other
people, but one never imagines it can happen to me. ... The community is
saturated with police brutality. ... I want for justice to be done.” This
year Ramírez would have celebrated 23 years of marriage with
Cáceres.


On Aug. 15, hundreds of demonstrators expressed their anger in front of the
General Headquarters of the Police Department in San Juan. Family members of
youth slain by the police were present.


Maribel Rivera, whose nephew Nelson Santiago was slain by police, told
reporters: “We are here to condemn police brutality. ... It is difficult
to expose if you don’t have a video. Pito (Nelson Sanitago) was shot
eight times by police.”


“My home town (Loiza), where Black people live, has been marked by police
abuse since the days when, in order to evict Adolfina Villanueva from her home,
they killed her,” said Lidia Ester Rivera Sánchez.


Participating in the demonstration were residents from the public housing projects of Villa Cañona and Manuel A. Pérez. Also present at the demonstration were the Socialist Front, Electrical Workers Union, Hostos
National Movement, the Federation of Teachers, Friends of the Sea, University
Workers Union, Caribbean Project for Peace and Justice, Puerto Rican
Independence Party, Independent Union of Legal Aid Attorneys and others.


Family demands: no state police at funeral


On Aug. 16 Cáceres was buried. The family demanded that no state police be
present in the activities throughout the day. Their demands were met.


Thousands of working people, touched by the tragedy of the killing, participated. An honor guard representing various motorcycle clubs stood by Cáceres’ coffin, while the lobby and outside of the Toñito Flores Funeral Home in Humacao were jam packed.


People in the adjoining community near the funeral home waited on corners and on rooftops to pay their last respects. The almost mile-long caravan that left the funeral home literally took over the highway on the way to Punta Santiago, where the municipal cemetery is located.


Once there, Armando Cáceres, the brother of Miguel Cáceres, led a march of hundreds of residents followed by a caravan of motorbikes, cars and the hearse carrying Miguel’s body. The march lasted for almost three hours as it went through Punta Santiago demanding justice.


Crowds formed in front of establishments to see the hearse and to pay tribute.
Some men and women, handkerchiefs in hand, wept while many more joined the
march to the municipal cemetery, where hundreds more residents awaited the
arrival of the march.


As Cáceres’ casket was taken from the hearse and carried into the
cemetery, the crowds filling the streets and cemetery broke out into thunderous
applause in his honor.


A banner reading “Police Assassins, We Want Justice, Enough!” was
held high, as Cáceres’ casket was lowered into the grave in the
presence of his parents Lidia and Miguel, wife Evelyn, his two daughters
Michelle and Jenny, his brother Armando and other family. In the final moments
the crowd chanted, “Justicia para Tony” (Justice for Tony). Tony
was Miguel’s nickname in the community.


Due to the extraordinary public pressure, by week’s end Pagán had
been expelled from the police force and charged with first degree murder, but
he was immediately released on reduced bail. Allegedly he is confined to his
home by electronic bracelet. Police agent Zulma Díaz de León was also
charged with first-degree murder. The third agent, Carlos Sustache, has not
been charged with wrongdoing.




Articles copyright 1995-2007 Workers World.
Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.


Bioethics group raises DNA database concerns

Published Wednesday 19th September 2007 11:20 GMT

Analysis The Nuffield Council on Bioethics (http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/) has condemned the retention of "innocent" DNA on the National Database as unjustifed and unethical with "overtones of a police state".




The council - a group of clinicians, lawyers, philosophers, scientists, and theologians - was established in 1991 to examine ethical issues raised by new developments in science.









In its report, The Forensic Use of DNA and Fingerprints: Ethical Issues (http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/go/ourwork/bioinformationuse/publication_441.html), the council recommends that police should only be allowed to permanently store bioinformation from people who are convicted of a crime.



Today, the police of England and Wales have wider sampling powers than the police force of any other country, and the UK has (proportionally, per head of population) the largest forensic database in the world.



When the police first began using DNA, consent was required before samples could be taken. A succession of Acts of Parliament and legislative amendments has increased police powers of sampling; the police can now take DNA samples from all persons arrested, without their consent, for recordable offences (an "arbitrary" classification), and retain the samples indefinitely regardless of whether the person arrested is subsequently convicted or even charged.



In response to comments from the Home Office that retaining the DNA of people who were innocent at the time of arrest had helped to solve crimes they committed years later, the Nuffield Council stuck to its guns. "There has to be a limit to police powers," said Dr Carole McCartney, one of the report's authors. "DNA shouldn't be retained simply on the basis that it might turn out to be useful."



She added that many of the statistics from the Home Office were "inconsistent, incomplete and confusing" and that much of its evidence consisted of anecdotal accounts of "horrible men caught with DNA".



The council recommended that the police should put more resources into the collection of DNA from crime scenes, noting that less than 20 per cent of crime scenes are forensically examined, but urged caution with regard to their analysis.



Professor Read outlined some of the information that could be mined from a data rich bio-sample found at the scene of a crime. Conceding that recent advances permitted forensic scientists to have a "pretty good stab at the eye colour", and quickly identify redheads, ethnic profiles generated by DNA analysis were still limited to providing a "very iffy statistical prediction" and there was a danger that such predictions encouraged the police to narrow the focus of their inquiries prematurely.



The council rejected calls for a population-wide database, which would "make all citizens suspects", on account of the lack of empirical evidence that this would substantially improve crime detection rates. It dismissed the "nothing to hide, nothing to fear" argument as "fallacious".



The finding of a match between a person and a crime scene does not indicate that the person was at the crime scene or that they committed the crime in question, but it might lead to them being subjected to a police investigation.



The report points out that "simply being the subject of a criminal investigation by the police can cause harm, distress, and stigma", and Sir Bob Hepple QC, chairman of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, cited a newspaper comment on the McCann case that the couple would find it "difficult to prove their innocence" as a result of widely reported forensic links.





Concern was also expressed about new uses to which the database is now being put and the acute lack of ethical oversight. The original aim of the DNA database was to match crime scene samples to suspect samples. It is now being used for "increasingly speculative searches", including "ethnic inferences" and "genetic predisposition to crime".



Council members have been unable to discover the nature of all the research projects permitted by the DNA Database Custodian, and criticise the lack of transparency over the granting of third party requests for access to the database.



In light of the shifting applications of genetic information, the council recommends those who voluntarily provide the police with their DNA, including victims and witnesses, should be able to have it removed from the National DNA Database at any time without having to give a reason.



Currently, a volunteer's decision to consent at the time of sampling to their profiles being permanently loaded onto the database is irrevocable. This is in direct contrast to standard practice in medical research.



There is no framework in place for regulating international exchange of data between law enforcement agencies, compounding the council's concerns about potential misuses of the database.



The council recommends that the Government, as a matter of urgency, examine the implications of sharing the DNA material of UK citizens with foreign law enforcement agencies and private forensic science companies. Analysis and storage of biological samples is currently performed by three companies, and this number is set to rise.



GeneWatch alerted the public to the insecurity of the DNA database in 2006 when it obtained disclosure of confidential emails revealing that LGC, a company used by the police to analyse DNA samples, had been secretly keeping the genetic samples and personal details of hundreds of thousands of people (http://observer.guardian.co.uk/politics/story/0,,1821749,00.html).



The Nuffield Council recommends that the organisations and companies with custody of biological samples complete a standard Material Transfer Agreement, subject to ethical review, that establishes the terms and conditions under which samples may be accessed.



During the public consultation exercise, a number of people expressed grave concern about health-related information that might be obtained from the bio-samples. Unfortunately, the report fails to address this concern in any detail, and Professor Read said he found it "difficult to imagine what possible use the police could make of such information".



Not everyone is so sanguine. The British Medical Association recently outlined its concerns about the "militarisation of biology" in its report The Use of Drugs As Weapons: The Concerns and Responsibilities of Healthcare Professionals (http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/AttachmentsByTitle/PDFdrugsasweapons/$FILE/DrugsasWeapons.pdf) (pdf).



The report refers to the potential use of genetic material to satisfy the search for specificity by "less than lethal" weapon enthusiasts, and cites a paper by two Chinese authors in the 2005 Military Review in which they state: "If we acquire a target's genome and proteome information, including those of ethnic groups or individuals, we could design a vulnerating agent that attacks only key enemies without doing any harm to ordinary people". ®



Amber Marks is a lawyer, currently undertaking research into surveillance. Her book Headspace: On the Trail of Sniffer Dogs, Wasp Wardens, and Other Dumb Friends in the Surveillance Industry is due to be published by Virgin Books in March 2008.




© Copyright 2007

The Haptic Radar / Extended Skin Project

Ever wanted some cat's whiskers or insect antenna? Probably not, but check out this head-mounted haptic device developed by researchers at the University of Tokyo in Japan. It lets a wearer "feel" their surroundings from a distance, roughly as if they had several long whiskers sticking out of the head. At least, that's what the researchers say.

A series of infrared sensors positioned around the device act as invisible whisker or antenna sensors. When these detect an object, a small motor vibrates on the appropriate side of the wearer's head to alert them.

We've written plenty about similar haptic devices, including head-mounted ones. For example, this report from the Siggraph2007 conference includes a couple of interesting hand-based haptic devices. This magazine article rounds-up several other research projects including a headband that converts video footage into signals felt by the user on their forehead.

I've never seen this type of haptic device being tested out, however. So it's interesting to see this video of volunteers using the device after just a few minutes instruction. I was impressed by how instinctively people react to an incoming object while wearing the device. Another clip shows the same device being used to navigate a virtual maze. It must be a freaky feeling.

Via: Hackaday

Will Knight, online technology editor

Labels: , , ,









We are developing a wearable and modular device allowing users to perceive and respond to spatial information using haptic cues in an intuitive and unobstrusive way.The system is composed of an array of "optical-hair modules", each of which senses range information and transduces it as an appropriate vibro-tactile cue on the skin directly beneath it. An analogy for our artificial sensory system in the animal world would be the cellular cilia, insect antennae, as well as the specialized sensory hairs of mammalian whiskers. In the future, this modular interface may cover precise skin regions or be distributed in over the entire body surface and then function as a double-skin with enhanced and tunable sensing capabilities. We speculate that for a particular category of tasks (such as clear path finding and collision avoidance), the efficiency of this type of sensory transduction may be greater than what can be expected from more classical vision-to-tactile substitution systems. Among the targeted applications of this interface are visual prosthetics for the blind, augmentation of spatial awareness in hazardous working environments, as well as enhanced obstacle awareness for car drivers (in this case the extended-skin sensors may cover the surface of the car).























In a word, what we are proposing here is to build artificial, wearable, ligh-based hairs (or antennae). The actual hair stem will be an invisible, steerable laser beam. In the near future, we may be able to create on-chip, skin-implantable whiskers using MOEMS technology. Results in a similar direction have been already achieved in the framework of the smart laser scanner project in our lab. Our first prototype (headband configuration) provides the wearer with 360 degrees of spatial awareness and had very positive reviews in our proof-of-principle experiments.





Movies



  • Prototype proof-of-principle collision-avoidance experiment: (April 2006): [wmv: 21MB] / [mov: 131MB / 29MB]

  • Computer-controlled headband simulator (virtual maze): [wmv: 10MB]



Reference





  1. Cassinelli, A., Reynolds, C. and Ishikawa, M. (2006) "Augmenting spatial awareness with Haptic Radar". Tenth International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), October 11 - 14, 2006, Montreux, Switzerland. Short paper (4 pages) [PDF-103KB]. Slide presentation [PPT-6.4MB]. Unpublished long version (6 pages) [PDF-268KB].



  2. Cassinelli, A., Reynolds, C. and Ishikawa, M. "Haptic Radar". The 33rd International Conference and Exhibition on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (SIGGRAPH), August 1, (2006), Boston, Massachusetts, USA. [PDF-202KB, Large Quicktime Video, Small Quicktime Video, MPG-4].


  3. More detailed project web page: http://www.k2.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/perception/HapticRadar/HapticRadar_LongPage.html

Debbie Stevens And Randy Kelton At Ground Zero

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

University of Florida student Tasered questioning Senator John Kerry










"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
Please call to express your concerns about this horrific incident:
University of Florida Police Department: (352) 392-1111
University of Florida Public Information Office: (352) 273-3301
University of Florida main switchboard: (352) 392-3261
University of Florida Police Department's Dispatch Center: (352) 392-1111 available 24-hours daily.

Is Hollywood trying to tell us something?





















Pay Attention to the 1st 40 seconds





MK Ultra? Excuses used by the Globalists? The real reason for bringing Internet 2 online, and shutting down alternate media?




Decide for yourself...

Wake Up, Don't Be Afraid!!!

Let's get an outsider's opinion

Monday, September 17, 2007

A Snapshot of Let's Make History 9/11/07

The event held by We Are Change NYC was a success, opening the eyes of
so many people during the 5 day event is one for the history books. But
don't be fooled, this isn't the end, on the contrary this is only the
beginning. The Globalist started this fight, we'll end it...with all of
them being put on trail. For now let's all be inspired by the street
actions, by doing our own. Special thanks to the chapters of We Are
Change present and soon to come.

More photos & videos to follow....

Stay tuned...

DIGG THIS LIKE YOUR EXISTENCE DEPENDS ON IT...

Mystery Trader To Collect On Financial Meltdown?



Suspicion increases about so-called Bin Laden trades as markets tumble after bank run
Prison Planet September 17, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
A run on the Northern Rock bank in Britain has increased the possibility that a mystery trader could stand to collect around $2 billion should a panic send markets tumbling during the course of this week, as investors have predicted.
Last month, we reported on the mystery trader who risks losing around $1 billion dollars after placing 245,000 put options on the Dow Jones Eurostoxx 50 index, which led many analysts to speculate that a stock market crash preceded by a new 9/11 style attack or another catastrophe could take place before or during the third week of September.
The anonymous trader only stands to make money if the market crashes by a third to a half before September 21st, which is when the put options expire.
Following the run on the Northern Rock bank in Britain, specialist investors are now warning of an imminent and severe correction in the markets.
�The credit cycle has turned, bad debts are soaring, banks will go bust and stock markets will fall much further,� Ken Murray, the founder and chief executive of Blue Planet Investment Management, told the Financial Times today , shortly after selling half the equities in his portfolio.
The Northern Rock crisis was followed by Alan Greenspan's warning that both the US and UK housing markets are on the verge of a major downturn as Prime Minister Gordon Brown holds an emergency meeting with US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson today.
Thousands of people around Britain queued for hours at Northern Rock branches throughout Friday and Saturday attempting to withdraw their money as the global credit crunch sunk its teeth in again following the sub-prime mortgage fallout in the US.
Analysts from TheStreet.com dismissed last month's so-called Bin Laden trades as nothing out of the ordinary , but still noted that the transactions outstrip anything else seen in a year.
Though the current climate will undoubtedly send stocks tumbling, to see a downturn of a full third within a week is unlikely bar a catalyzing outside event like the announcement of military operations against Iran or a terror attack in the west on the scale of 9/11.
"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. " - Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK Get TerrorStorm on DVD today

US security firm Blackwater banned from Iraq

UK Daily Mail September 16, 2007 JASON LEWIS
The DNA of a seven-month-old baby girl has been added to the police's national database designed to identify criminals.
The disclosure reignited the row over the growth of Britain's DNA register, which is the biggest in the world.
Human rights groups accuse the Government of building a genetic record of the entire UK population by stealth.
It was revealed this year that more than 100,000 DNA samples had been taken from children, aged ten to 16, who have never been charged or convicted of any crime.
Now the news that a baby's genetic profile is stored on the system saw leading campaigners react with horror and disgust.
She is one of 47 children under ten whose DNA has been recorded and will be retained by the police until after their deaths.
Civil liberties organisation Liberty said the baby girl's case was "a chilling example of how out of control the DNA database has become".
Children can be added to the register only with their parents' agreement, but Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti said: "This baby has not given her consent to be on this criminal database. Who knows the circumstances that led to her parent or guardian agreeing to put her profile on the system?"
She added: "DNA is the most intimate material. It can be used to identify who your parents are, and indicate your life expectancy.
"Should the police be able to keep this information about this little girl � and thousands like her � forever?"
Commons Home Affairs Committee chairman Keith Vaz said that the case was "unbelievable".
The former Europe Minister added: "This is not what this system was set up for and I will be demanding an explanation from Ministers."
The Mail on Sunday has learned that the baby's DNA sample was taken earlier this year by West Yorkshire Police.
According to the National Policing Improvement Agency, it was loaded on to the database "with parental/guardian consent as a volunteer victim".
A West Yorkshire Police spokesman confirmed they had taken the baby's DNA, but said it was at the request of West Midlands Police.
However, the Birmingham-based force refused to discuss the circumstances of the case.
Amazingly, a spokeswoman claimed they could not find any details without the child's name or date of birth.
The information about the baby girl's record came out after a Freedom of Information request by The Mail on Sunday which revealed that DNA samples of 47 children under ten were kept on the system.
Gavin McKinnon, of the NPIA, said profiles of 38 children were put on the register by police in England and Wales and nine by forces in Scotland.
Two of the English and Welsh samples were taken "following police contact", the others were "volunteered with written consent of a parent or guardian".
He added: "Separate written consent is also needed to load the sample on to the database."
In Scotland, where the age of criminal responsibility is eight, the nine samples were provided by children who had been arrested for an offence.
Mr McKinnon said that in England and Wales "officers cannot take samples from a child under ten without a parent or guardian's consent."
He added: "Volunteer samples for upload to the database can play an important role in an investigation."
They are normally taken to "eliminate an individual's profile" � for example, witnesses at a crime scene � and where there is a "need to establish a family link as part of an investigation".
A Home Office spokeswoman said samples from children under ten were only taken and retained on the database "with explicit written consent" of their parents.
She said: "Anyone can apply to the chief constable of the force that took the sample to ask for it to be removed."
But civil rights campaigners say that, in practice, it is very difficult to get your DNA wiped off the register.
Last week lawyers from Liberty finally won a six-month battle with Avon and Somerset Constabulary to have the DNA of an innocent 13-year-old boy removed from the national database. He had been falsely accused of writing graffiti.
The database permanently retains the DNA of approximately four million people.
This month Appeal Court judge Lord Justice Sedley called for it to be expanded to include everyone living in or visiting the UK.
"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. " - Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK Get TerrorStorm on DVD today

France warning of war with Iran

BBC September 17, 2007
French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner says the world should prepare for war over Iran's nuclear programme.
"We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war," Mr Kouchner said in an interview on French TV and radio.
He was speaking ahead of a visit to Russia on Monday, during which Iran is likely to feature prominently.
Iran's nuclear programme will also be one of the main issues for the UN nuclear watchdog's annual conference, starting in Vienna on Monday.
Iran denies it is trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and says it only wants nuclear power to generate electricity for civilian purposes.
But it has repeatedly rejected UN demands to give up the enrichment of uranium, which the US and other Western states fear is being diverted to a nuclear weapons project.
Tougher approach
Mr Kouchner said negotiations with Iran should continue "right to the end", but that an Iranian nuclear weapon would pose "a real danger for the whole world".
He said a number of large French companies had been asked not to tender for business in Iran. "We are not banning French companies from submitting. We have advised them not to. These are private companies."
"But I think that it has been heard and we are not the only ones to have done this."
Mr Kouchner will seek agreement with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov over tighter UN sanctions to try to force Iran to give up enrichment, the French foreign ministry says.
Russia has a UN Security Council veto over any new sanctions, and its support is seen as vital for any new approach. It also has perhaps the greatest leverage over Tehran, as the supplier of fuel for its nuclear reactor.
But Mr Kouchner said even in the absence of UN action, the European Union should prepare its own sanctions against Iran.
"We have decided while negotiations are continuing, to prepare eventual sanctions outside the ambit of UN sanctions. Our good friends, the Germans, suggested that," he said.
'Playing for time'
Iran has warned that any new punishments could push it to stop co-operating with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
The IAEA's members meet this week in Austria, with Iran likely to top the agenda.
The director of the organisation, Mohamed ElBaradei, has been criticised in the West over a new deal with Iran to clear up questions about its past nuclear activities. The US and its allies believe the deal just gives Iran more time, during which they fear it will advance its nuclear programme.
Since becoming foreign minister earlier this year, Mr Kouchner has not shied away from controversy.
Last month he was quoted as saying the Iraqi government was "not functioning" and seemed to hint that Prime Minister Nouri Maliki should resign, provoking an angry reaction from Baghdad.
The BBC's diplomatic correspondent Jonathan Marcus says France has changed its approach to world affairs under its new President Nicolas Sarkozy, adopting a harder line on several issues, and seeking to improve relations with the United States.
But it is the tougher rhetoric aimed at Tehran which will please Washington the most, he says.
Until now the UN Security Council has imposed economic sanctions on Iran, but did not allow for military action.
The United States has not ruled out a military attack against Iran to prevent it from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
"TerrorStorm is something that should be seen by everyone, no matter what their stance/affiliation/political bent. " - Rich Rosell, Digitally Obsessed UK Get TerrorStorm on DVD today